Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.86no data
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU104B
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)8 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speedno data1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data9.492 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 110 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.