GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in performance ranking	766	50
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.79
Architecture	no data	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	no data	Turing TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699
Current price	no data	$599 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	3072
Core clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1815 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	348.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Qualcomm Adreno 680 and GeForce RTX 2080 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	495.9 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.75

RTX 2080 Super 50.71
+1744%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 1744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 761

RTX 2080 Super 19585
+2474%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 2474% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

RTX 2080 Super 40963
+2016%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 2016% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −1914%	141 +1914%
1440p	5−6 −1780%	94 +1780%
4K	3−4 −2267%	71 +2267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−1760%

90−95
+1760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1880%	99 +1880%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −1840%	194 +1840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −2017%	127 +2017%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1760%	90−95 +1760%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1914%	141 +1914%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1789%	170 +1789%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1943%	143 +1943%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1783%	113 +1783%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −2017%	254 +2017%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1933%	122 +1933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1879%	277 +1879%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −1800%	114 +1800%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2075%	87 +2075%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1922%	182 +1922%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1900%	120 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1760%	90−95 +1760%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1767%	112 +1767%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −2033%	128 +2033%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −2050%	258 +2050%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1921%	283 +1921%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1900%	120 +1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1775%	225 +1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1850%	195 +1850%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −2010%	211 +2010%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2150%	90 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1800%	133 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1925%	162 +1925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1790%	189 +1790%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2080%	109 +2080%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1775%	75 +1775%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−1867%

118

+1867%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1814%	134 +1814%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1943%	143 +1943%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1880%	99 +1880%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1800%	57 +1800%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1850%	117 +1850%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −2017%	127 +2017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1925%	80−85 +1925%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −1800%	57 +1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−2040%

107

+2040%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2550%	53 +2550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −2200%	65−70 +2200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1950%	41 +1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3500%	36 +3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1825%	77 +1825%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2000%	63 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −3300%	34 +3300%