Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Quadro4 980 XGL
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 506 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 11 |
| Architecture | Kelvin (2001−2003) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | NV28 A2 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 November 2002 (21 year ago) | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 36 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.400 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro4 980 XGL and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | AGP 8x | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 November 2002 | 7 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 7 nm |
RX Vega 7 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro4 980 XGL and Radeon RX Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro4 980 XGL is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
