Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro4 550 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated31
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.44
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 February 2002 (22 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$579

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed270 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors29 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data263 Watt
Texture fill rate1.080604.8
ROPs4128
TMUs4240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RX 7800 XT has an age advantage of 21 year, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 550 XGL and Radeon RX 7800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 550 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 550 XGL
Quadro4 550 XGL
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 550 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2397 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.