GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro4 380 XGL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.62
Power efficiencyno data26.32
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV18 A4TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2002 (22 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed275 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors29 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100128.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed256 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.192 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro4 380 XGL 6
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+146800%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2002 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has an age advantage of 16 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 380 XGL and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 380 XGL is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL
Quadro4 380 XGL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 281 vote

Rate Quadro4 380 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 536 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.