Tegra 3 vs Quadro2 MXR Low Profile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Tegra 3
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2000 (24 years ago)9 November 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz416 MHz
Boost clock speedno data520 MHz
Number of transistors20 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate0.84.160
ROPs48
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed183 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.928 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
OpenGL1.2ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2000 9 November 2011
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm

Tegra 3 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro2 MXR Low Profile and Tegra 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro2 MXR Low Profile is a workstation graphics card while Tegra 3 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
NVIDIA Tegra 3
Tegra 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Quadro2 MXR Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Tegra 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.