Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro T600 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	307	34
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	41.15
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449
Current price	no data	$443 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	3456
Core clock speed	no data	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	74.76	549.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T600 Mobile and Radeon RX 7700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 16.48

RX 7700 XT 57.60
+250%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T600 Mobile 10498

RX 7700 XT 57340
+446%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 446% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T600 Mobile 39112

RX 7700 XT 126733
+224%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 224% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T600 Mobile 7928

RX 7700 XT 42801
+440%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 440% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T600 Mobile 53941

RX 7700 XT 201871
+274%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 274% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 −253%	180 +253%
1440p	27−30 −281%	103 +281%
4K	16−18 −269%	59 +269%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30	no data
Battlefield 5	50−55	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27	no data
Far Cry 5	53	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	no data
Hitman 3	30−35	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30	no data
Battlefield 5	50−55	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27	no data
Far Cry 5	49	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	no data
Hitman 3	30−35	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70	no data
Metro Exodus	55−60	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30	no data
Battlefield 5	50−55 −233%	180−190 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27	no data
Far Cry 5	45	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −233%	150−160 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55	no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Hitman 3	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −233%	110−120 +233%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −233%	90−95 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −223%	100−105 +223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	no data
Battlefield 5	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −223%	100−105 +223%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12	no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	no data
Battlefield 5	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	9−10	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus

130−140

−233%

450−500
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −221%	350−400 +221%
Horizon Zero Dawn	216 −247%	750−800 +247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	287 −248%	1000−1050 +248%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−242%

400−450
+242%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 −225%	400−450 +225%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −241%	450−500 +241%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −230%	300−310 +230%
Hitman 3	80−85 −246%	280−290 +246%
Horizon Zero Dawn	171 −222%	550−600 +222%
Metro Exodus	134 −236%	450−500 +236%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 −237%	650−700 +237%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120 −233%	400−450 +233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
−206%

300−310

+206%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −244%	220−230 +244%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −233%	180−190 +233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −241%	140−150 +241%
Horizon Zero Dawn	103 −240%	350−400 +240%
Metro Exodus	89 −237%	300−310 +237%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−233%

190−200

+233%

This is how T600 Mobile and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 253% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 281% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 269% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.48	57.60
Recency	12 April 2021	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	245 Watt