Radeon RX 6300 vs Quadro T600 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6
16.37
+8.1%

Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6300 by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking305325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate74.7697.92

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro T600 Mobile and Radeon RX 6300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.1
HDMIno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Hitman 3 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Hitman 3 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Hitman 3 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

This is how T600 Mobile and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 13.3% faster than RX 6300 in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 16.37 15.15
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 32 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro T600 Mobile and Radeon RX 6300.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.