Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs GeForce GTX 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 770
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 230 Watt
15.34
+38.3%

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon RX 560X Mobile by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking324393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.645.15
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameGK104Polaris 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)5 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$254 (0.6x MSRP)$520

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 560X Mobile has 41% better value for money than GTX 770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361024
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1046 MHz1172 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt60-80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate134 billion/sec81.60
Floating-point performance3,333 gflops2,611 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon RX 560X Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7012 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.3 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSyncno data+
Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770 15.34
+38.3%
RX 560X Mobile 11.09

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon RX 560X Mobile by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 770 8150
+28.8%
RX 560X Mobile 6329

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon RX 560X Mobile by 29% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+25%
36
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Hitman 3 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Metro Exodus 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+40%
75−80
−40%
Hitman 3 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 770 and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770 is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.34 11.09
Recency 30 May 2013 5 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 60 Watt

The GeForce GTX 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1448 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 369 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.