Radeon 610M vs Quadro T600 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
18.37
+536%

T600 Mobile outperforms 610M by a whopping 536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking304791
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiency31.6713.29
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Dragon Range
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896128
Core clock speed780 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate78.9617.60
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs568
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.37
+536%
Radeon 610M 2.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7061
+536%
Radeon 610M 1111

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498
+267%
Radeon 610M 2863

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 Mobile 39112
+224%
Radeon 610M 12065

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928
+303%
Radeon 610M 1965

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941
+288%
Radeon 610M 13898

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T600 Mobile 2766
+381%
Radeon 610M 576

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+264%
14
−264%
1440p500−550
+533%
79
−533%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Far Cry 5 53
+563%
8−9
−563%
Fortnite 95−100
+607%
14−16
−607%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+300%
19
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+600%
18−20
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Valorant 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Dota 2 116
+1060%
10
−1060%
Far Cry 5 49
+133%
21
−133%
Fortnite 95−100
+519%
16−18
−519%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+443%
14
−443%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+294%
16
−294%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+355%
11
−355%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+367%
27−30
−367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+373%
10−12
−373%
Valorant 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
World of Tanks 220−230
+323%
50−55
−323%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Dota 2 107
+1238%
8−9
−1238%
Far Cry 5 45
+165%
16−18
−165%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+591%
11
−591%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+367%
27−30
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+600%
4−5
−600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+607%
14−16
−607%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Valorant 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Valorant 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
World of Tanks 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 264% faster in 1080p
  • T600 Mobile is 533% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 Mobile is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 41 test (68%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.37 2.89
Recency 12 April 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 535.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 610M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 816 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.