RTX A4000 Mobile vs Quadro T600 Mobile

Place in the ranking	302	112
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	31.62	23.71
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	GA104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	5120
Core clock speed	780 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	1410 MHz	1680 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.96	268.8
Floating-point processing power	2.527 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	56	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 18.33

RTX A4000 Mobile 39.52
+116%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7049

RTX A4000 Mobile 15197
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−96.1%

100−110
+96.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Elden Ring	52 −167%	130−140 +167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −78%	100−110 +78%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Elden Ring	45 −111%	95−100 +111%
Far Cry 5	53 −108%	110−120 +108%
Fortnite	95−100 −112%	210−220 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −153%	190−200 +153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −114%	270−280 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −79.1%	75−80 +79.1%
Valorant	70−75 −114%	150−160 +114%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −78%	100−110 +78%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Dota 2	116 −6%	120−130 +6%
Elden Ring	34 −309%	130−140 +309%
Far Cry 5	49 −98%	95−100 +98%
Fortnite	95−100 −73.7%	170−180 +73.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −153%	190−200 +153%
Grand Theft Auto V	63 −95.2%	120−130 +95.2%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −88%	90−95 +88%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −59.5%	200−210 +59.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −79.1%	75−80 +79.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 −169%	140−150 +169%
Valorant	70−75 −114%	150−160 +114%
World of Tanks	220−230 −26.8%	270−280 +26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −78%	100−110 +78%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Dota 2	107 −15%	120−130 +15%
Far Cry 5	45 −116%	95−100 +116%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −153%	190−200 +153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −59.5%	200−210 +59.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −114%	60−65 +114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

95−100
−112%

210−220

+112%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	30−33 −170%	80−85 +170%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −152%	70−75 +152%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −107%	85−90 +107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −144%	35−40 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Valorant	45−50 −113%	100−105 +113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −97.3%	70−75 +97.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −148%	110−120 +148%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

45−50
−113%

100−105

+113%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −152%	75−80 +152%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −154%	30−35 +154%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −152%	75−80 +152%
Valorant	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Dota 2	30−35 −152%	75−80 +152%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −157%	55−60 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −141%	65−70 +141%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

−105%

45−50
+105%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
World of Tanks	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

This is how T600 Mobile and RTX A4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4000 Mobile is 96% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 309% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 44 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.33	39.52
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	115 Watt

T600 Mobile has 187.5% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 115.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.