Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	263	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	37.48
Power efficiency	23.85	17.22
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 31
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	5376
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1387 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2394 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	114.2	804.4
Floating-point processing power	3.656 TFLOPS	51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	192
TMUs	64	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	276 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	800.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.70

RX 7900 XT 74.75
+261%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985

RX 7900 XT 28835
+261%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524

RX 7900 XT 75896
+461%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −276%	207 +276%
1440p	35−40 −309%	143 +309%
4K	24−27 −263%	87 +263%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.34
1440p	no data	6.29
4K	no data	10.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−618%

237
+618%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −233%	150−160 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −286%	130−140 +286%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −253%	240−250 +253%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −186%	120−130 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −542%	212 +542%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −236%	180−190 +236%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −92.1%	240−250 +92.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −215%	120−130 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −171%	260−270 +171%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −118%	150−160 +118%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −124%	120−130 +124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −364%	300−350 +364%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −64.5%	150−160 +64.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −233%	150−160 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −286%	130−140 +286%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −253%	240−250 +253%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −186%	120−130 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −476%	190 +476%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −236%	180−190 +236%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −92.1%	240−250 +92.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −215%	120−130 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −171%	260−270 +171%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −118%	150−160 +118%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −124%	120−130 +124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −613%	492 +613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −252%	160−170 +252%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −64.5%	150−160 +64.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −233%	150−160 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −286%	130−140 +286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −186%	120−130 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −442%	179 +442%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −146%	110−120 +146%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −92.1%	240−250 +92.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −215%	120−130 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −254%	350 +254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −514%	424 +514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −476%	265 +476%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −64.5%	150−160 +64.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−124%

120−130
+124%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −315%	160−170 +315%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −250%	110−120 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −324%	85−90 +324%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −411%	95−100 +411%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −257%	80−85 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −917%	122 +917%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −250%	80−85 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −134%	270−280 +134%
Hitman 3	24−27 −354%	100−110 +354%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −560%	277 +560%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −262%	141 +262%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −656%	325 +656%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −475%	130−140 +475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −98.3%	240−250 +98.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−253%

120−130
+253%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −340%	85−90 +340%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −331%	65−70 +331%
Hitman 3	16−18 −319%	65−70 +319%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −111%	220−230 +111%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −455%	120−130 +455%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −657%	159 +657%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −425%	60−65 +425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −455%	60−65 +455%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −373%	50−55 +373%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1400%	60 +1400%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −386%	130−140 +386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −621%	173 +621%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−367%

80−85
+367%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 276% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 309% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 263% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900 XT surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.70	74.75
Recency	27 May 2019	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	300 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 261.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.