GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.62no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)18 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024896
Core clock speed1200 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate103.789.04
Floating-point processing power3.318 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6456
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 18 June 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 90 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has 125% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T2000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 75 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 275 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.