AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
GCN 1.0
GPU code name
Market segment
Launch date
5 May 2015 (6 years ago)
18 June 2020 (less than a year ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
900 MHz
no data
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
1590 MHz
Number of transistors
950 million
10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt
90 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
806.4 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
145 mm
229 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
192.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (11_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model

Competitors of Radeon R5 340X OEM from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R5 340X OEM from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 550 Ti.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R5 340X OEM:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 from AMD is Radeon HD 7950.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 TU106:

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

Lower power consumption (65W vs 90W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Much newer (18 June 2020 vs 5 May 2015)

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

More pipelines (896 vs 384)

Higher memory bandwidth (192 vs 16 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.