Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, including specs and performance data.
RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 337 | 63 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 72.67 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 4 (2025) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (4 years ago) | 2 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 2530 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.918 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 64 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | - |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 58
−140%
| 139
+140%
|
| 1440p | 33
−97%
| 65
+97%
|
| 4K | 81
+88.4%
| 43
−88.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−107%
|
150−160
+107%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
−146%
|
160−170
+146%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
−136%
|
220−230
+136%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−171%
|
190−200
+171%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−185%
|
150−160
+185%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−160%
|
170−180
+160%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−109%
|
280−290
+109%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−107%
|
150−160
+107%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
−26.2%
|
270−280
+26.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 114
−163%
|
300−310
+163%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
−136%
|
220−230
+136%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−171%
|
190−200
+171%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−185%
|
150−160
+185%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
−115%
|
150−160
+115%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−239%
|
120−130
+239%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−160%
|
170−180
+160%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
−266%
|
260
+266%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−109%
|
280−290
+109%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−107%
|
150−160
+107%
|
| Dota 2 | 107
−180%
|
300−310
+180%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
−186%
|
160−170
+186%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−171%
|
190−200
+171%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−160%
|
170−180
+160%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−259%
|
133
+259%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 95−100
−136%
|
220−230
+136%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
−188%
|
350−400
+188%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
−197%
|
110−120
+197%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−252%
|
80−85
+252%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−178%
|
75−80
+178%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
−86%
|
300−350
+86%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−152%
|
120−130
+152%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
−215%
|
120−130
+215%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−266%
|
160−170
+266%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 40−45
−260%
|
140−150
+260%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−281%
|
120−130
+281%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−264%
|
50−55
+264%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−240%
|
85
+240%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
−200%
|
300−310
+200%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−231%
|
85−90
+231%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
−175%
|
300−310
+175%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−280%
|
75−80
+280%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−265%
|
110−120
+265%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−406%
|
85−90
+406%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
−322%
|
75−80
+322%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 98
+0%
|
98
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is 140% faster in 1080p
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is 97% faster in 1440p
- T1200 Mobile is 88% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 9060 XT 16GB is 406% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is ahead in 41 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.18 | 50.59 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 2 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 194.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
