Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon RX 6650M XT, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
17.57

6650M XT outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking353133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.2226.19
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed855 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20309.2
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−107%
120−130
+107%
1440p33
−112%
70−75
+112%
4K81
−110%
170−180
+110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Far Cry 5 65
−92.3%
120−130
+92.3%
Fortnite 95−100
−75%
160−170
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−105%
150−160
+105%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−120%
120−130
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−128%
150−160
+128%
Valorant 130−140
−65.7%
220−230
+65.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−25.8%
270−280
+25.8%
Dota 2 114
−26.3%
140−150
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 59
−112%
120−130
+112%
Fortnite 95−100
−75%
160−170
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−105%
150−160
+105%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−120%
120−130
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−81.7%
120−130
+81.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−145%
90−95
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−128%
150−160
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−95.8%
130−140
+95.8%
Valorant 130−140
−65.7%
220−230
+65.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Dota 2 107
−34.6%
140−150
+34.6%
Far Cry 5 56
−123%
120−130
+123%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−105%
150−160
+105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−128%
150−160
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−276%
130−140
+276%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
−75%
160−170
+75%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−112%
270−280
+112%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−119%
80−85
+119%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−148%
55−60
+148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−112%
55−60
+112%
Valorant 150−160
−62.9%
250−260
+62.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
−98%
95−100
+98%
Far Cry 5 41
−132%
95−100
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−152%
110−120
+152%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−151%
100−110
+151%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−148%
60−65
+148%
Valorant 90−95
−163%
230−240
+163%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−130%
60−65
+130%
Dota 2 109
−1.8%
110−120
+1.8%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−160%
50−55
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−139%
70−75
+139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 107% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M XT is 112% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M XT is 110% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 276% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 44 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.57 38.85
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 120 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 567% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 121% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 169 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.