Radeon 740M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.01
+135%

T1200 Mobile outperforms 740M by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.1737.87
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Phoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed855 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate91.2040.00
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1200 Mobile 19.01
+135%
Radeon 740M 8.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+92.1%
Radeon 740M 7490

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+97.4%
Radeon 740M 5135

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+190%
20
−190%
1440p33
+136%
14−16
−136%
4K81
+170%
30−35
−170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+124%
30−35
−124%
Far Cry 5 65
+160%
24−27
−160%
Fortnite 95−100
+109%
45−50
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+121%
30−35
−121%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+168%
18−20
−168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%
Valorant 130−140
+73.8%
80−85
−73.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+124%
30−35
−124%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+82.9%
120−130
−82.9%
Dota 2 114
+153%
45−50
−153%
Far Cry 5 59
+136%
24−27
−136%
Fortnite 95−100
+109%
45−50
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+121%
30−35
−121%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+168%
18−20
−168%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+145%
29
−145%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+255%
20−22
−255%
Valorant 130−140
+73.8%
80−85
−73.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+124%
30−35
−124%
Dota 2 107
+138%
45−50
−138%
Far Cry 5 56
+124%
24−27
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+121%
30−35
−121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+143%
27−30
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+85%
20−22
−85%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+109%
45−50
−109%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Valorant 170−180
+98.9%
85−90
−98.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
Far Cry 5 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+271%
7−8
−271%
Valorant 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Dota 2 109
+142%
45−50
−142%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 13
+0%
13
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 190% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 136% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 170% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 41 test (64%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.01 8.09
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 135% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 740M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 91 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.