Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
16.49

Pro B50 outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking344194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency73.8034.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU117BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed855 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20332.8
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−72.4%
100−110
+72.4%
1440p33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
4K81
−72.8%
140−150
+72.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.49
1440pno data6.35
4Kno data2.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
−73.3%
130−140
+73.3%
Far Cry 5 65
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Fortnite 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Valorant 130−140
−75.2%
240−250
+75.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
−73.3%
130−140
+73.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−58.4%
350−400
+58.4%
Dota 2 114
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
Far Cry 5 59
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Fortnite 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Valorant 130−140
−75.2%
240−250
+75.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
−73.3%
130−140
+73.3%
Dota 2 107
−77.6%
190−200
+77.6%
Far Cry 5 56
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−76.9%
230−240
+76.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Valorant 170−180
−76.5%
300−310
+76.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%
Far Cry 5 41
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−75%
70−75
+75%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Valorant 100−105
−80%
180−190
+80%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Dota 2 109
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 72% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 67% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 73% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.49 29.82
Recency 12 April 2021 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 70 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 288.9% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 80.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 156 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.