UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro T1000
2019
50 Watt
16.35
+290%

T1000 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by a whopping 290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking334687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.24no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTU117Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed1395 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory clock speed8000 MHzno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+275%
16
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro T1000 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 275% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.35 4.19
Recency 27 May 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 290.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
vs
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
vs
2270 1GB Edition FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 680
vs
UHD Graphics 710 Graphics 710
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 680
vs
Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics G1 Graphics G1
Pro Vega II Duo AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
vs
A40 PCIe PCIe
Quadro T1000 NVIDIA Quadro T1000
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G1 Graphics Xe G1
T2000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
vs
RTX 3070 Max-Q 3070 Max-Q
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
vs
Graphics Graphics
UHD Graphics 920 Intel UHD Graphics 920
vs
RTX 4080 Max-Q RTX 4080 Max-Q
MX150 GP107 NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
vs
Arc A370M A370M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 437 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.