UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs CMP 40HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 RTX 8000 T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 Tesla T4
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 40HX with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

CMP 40HX
2021, $699
8 GB GDDR6, 185 Watt
21.54
+445%

CMP 40HX outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.88no data
Power efficiency8.94no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTU106Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2021 (4 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1470 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Wattno data
Texture fill rate237.6no data
Floating-point processing power7.603 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+431%
16
−431%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how CMP 40HX and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • CMP 40HX is 431% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.54 3.95
Recency 25 February 2021 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

CMP 40HX has a 445.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

The CMP 40HX is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
Instinct MI250 MI250
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
T1200 Mobile Mobile
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Xe 750 32EUs
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
PRO W6300 W6300
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Xe 750 32EUs
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
vs
PRO W6300 W6300

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 70 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 40HX or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.