Radeon RX 6650M vs Quadro T1000

Place in performance ranking	302	107
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.73	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 23
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$920	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1792
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	2222 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	270.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 6650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	no data	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro T1000 16.89

RX 6650M 38.67
+129%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms Quadro T1000 by 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro T1000 6521

RX 6650M 14934
+129%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms Quadro T1000 by 129% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

45−50

−153%

114
+153%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
−131%

127

+131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −150%	120−130 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −136%	106 +136%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −140%	95−100 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −147%	140−150 +147%
Hitman 3	30−33 −167%	80−85 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −142%	150−160 +142%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −147%	110−120 +147%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −133%	90−95 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −134%	222 +134%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −131%	104 +131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −150%	120−130 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −140%	95−100 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −147%	140−150 +147%
Hitman 3	30−33 −167%	80−85 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −142%	150−160 +142%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −147%	110−120 +147%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −133%	90−95 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −138%	190 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −139%	167 +139%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −140%	95−100 +140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −147%	140−150 +147%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −142%	150−160 +142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −139%	167 +139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −157%	90 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −130%	62 +130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−133%

90−95
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −147%	70−75 +147%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −157%	90−95 +157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −133%	40−45 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −131%	80−85 +131%
Hitman 3	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −140%	70−75 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −135%	90−95 +135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −133%	55−60 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−144%

65−70
+144%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −144%	35−40 +144%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
Hitman 3	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −156%	45−50 +156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −157%	50−55 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −138%	18−20 +138%