Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Quadro T1000

Place in the ranking	320	248
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	23.22	12.06
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 14
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1536
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1187 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1757 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	168.7
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro T1000 16.72

Pro 5500 XT 21.70
+29.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro T1000 6453

Pro 5500 XT 8375
+29.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.72	21.70
Recency	27 May 2019	4 August 2020
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	125 Watt

Quadro T1000 has 150% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500 XT, on the other hand, has a 29.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.