Tesla A100 vs Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU102GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46087936
Core clock speed1230 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate466.6550.6
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS17.62 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs288496
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount48 GB40 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm

RTX 8000 Passive has a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Tesla A100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.