Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.84no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameGP104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792128
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.