Radeon R7 350 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	110	570
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.58	0.82
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N19E-Q5	Cape Verde
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	6 July 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price	$3065	$142

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Mobile has 946% better value for money than R7 350.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	512
Core clock speed	1035 / 1350 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 / 1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 / 150 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	25.60
Floating-point performance	no data	819.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon R7 350 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +633%	18−20 −633%
1440p	86 +617%	12−14 −617%
4K	54 +671%	7−8 −671%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

+644%

9−10
−644%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +643%	14−16 −643%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +633%	9−10 −633%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +589%	18−20 −589%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	125 +594%	18−20 −594%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +644%	9−10 −644%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +600%	21−24 −600%
Hitman 3	75−80 +690%	10−11 −690%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +638%	21−24 −638%
Metro Exodus	144 +700%	18−20 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 +606%	16−18 −606%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +610%	21−24 −610%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94 +683%	12−14 −683%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +633%	9−10 −633%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +589%	18−20 −589%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +638%	16−18 −638%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +644%	9−10 −644%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +600%	21−24 −600%
Hitman 3	75−80 +690%	10−11 −690%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +638%	21−24 −638%
Metro Exodus	72 +620%	10−11 −620%
Red Dead Redemption 2	112 +600%	16−18 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +610%	21−24 −610%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +654%	24−27 −654%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 +630%	10−11 −630%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +633%	9−10 −633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +633%	12−14 −633%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +644%	9−10 −644%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +600%	21−24 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +638%	21−24 −638%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +610%	21−24 −610%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +614%	14−16 −614%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

+671%

14−16
−671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +640%	10−11 −640%
Far Cry New Dawn	135 +650%	18−20 −650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +600%	9−10 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +600%	6−7 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	81 +710%	10−11 −710%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Far Cry 5	102 +629%	14−16 −629%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +700%	10−11 −700%
Hitman 3	50−55 +614%	7−8 −614%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +620%	10−11 −620%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +675%	12−14 −675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +686%	7−8 −686%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +750%	4−5 −750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90
+650%

12−14

−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +660%	5−6 −660%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Hitman 3	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +700%	6−7 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +683%	6−7 −683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +610%	10−11 −610%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +700%	5−6 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +660%	5−6 −660%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +657%	7−8 −657%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +700%	6−7 −700%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +700%	5−6 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+614%

7−8
−614%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and R7 350 compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 633% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 617% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 671% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.41	5.58
Recency	27 May 2019	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	55 Watt