RTX 5000 Mobile vs P2000 Mobile

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
0.69
 
1.33
Architecture
Turing
 
Pascal
GPU code name
N19E-Q5
 
GP107GL
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
 
5 July 2017 (4 years ago)
Price now
$3065
 
$1477

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
3072
 
768
Core clock speed
1035 / 1350 MHz
 
1215 MHz
Boost clock speed
1545 / 1770 MHz
 
1468 MHz
Number of transistors
13,600 million
 
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
 
14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
110 Watt
 
50 Watt
Texture fill rate
296.6
 
77.14

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Quadro P2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR6
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
16 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
 
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
 
96.13 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
G-SYNC support
+
 
-

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
-
 
+
VR Ready
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
 
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
 
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
 
6.1

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 55.04 +7.6%
P2000 Mobile 51.14

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 117274 +169.2%
P2000 Mobile 43566

3DMark Fire Strike Score

RTX 5000 Mobile 18943 +207.5%
P2000 Mobile 6160

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Mobile 23035 +236.4%
P2000 Mobile 6847

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620 +193.5%
P2000 Mobile 8387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153 +64.3%
P2000 Mobile 32964

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 501167 +43.1%
P2000 Mobile 350317

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

RTX 5000 Mobile 120 +15.4%
P2000 Mobile 104

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 5000 Mobile 120 +15.4%
P2000 Mobile 104

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 5000 Mobile 149 +122.4%
P2000 Mobile 67

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

RTX 5000 Mobile 149 +122.4%
P2000 Mobile 67

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 5000 Mobile 93 +200%
P2000 Mobile 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

RTX 5000 Mobile 93 +200%
P2000 Mobile 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

RTX 5000 Mobile 109 +373.9%
P2000 Mobile 23

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 5000 Mobile 109 +373.9%
P2000 Mobile 23

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

RTX 5000 Mobile 95 +58.3%
P2000 Mobile 60

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 5000 Mobile 95 +58.3%
P2000 Mobile 60

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

RTX 5000 Mobile 26 +381.5%
P2000 Mobile 5.4

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

RTX 5000 Mobile 134 +106.2%
P2000 Mobile 65

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 5000 Mobile 134 +106.2%
P2000 Mobile 65

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 5000 Mobile 132 +88.6%
P2000 Mobile 70

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

RTX 5000 Mobile 132 +88.6%
P2000 Mobile 70

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

RTX 5000 Mobile satisfies 100% minimum and 100% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%

P2000 Mobile satisfies 100% minimum and 99% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
99%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
99%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
RTX 5000 Mobile
P2000 Mobile
1080p
 
133
no data
1440p
 
84
no data
4K
 
54
no data

1920x1080
Medium Settings

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
104
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
165
 
no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
156
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
128
 
no data
Red Dead Redemption 2
 
126
 
no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
104
 
no data

1920x1080
High Settings

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
94
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
162
 
no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
132
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
123
 
no data
Metro Exodus
 
99
 
no data
Red Dead Redemption 2
 
71
 
no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
99
 
no data

1920x1080
Ultra Settings

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
73
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
152
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
115
 
no data

2560x1440
High Settings

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
87
 
no data
Metro Exodus
 
59
 
no data
Red Dead Redemption 2
 
44
 
no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
87
 
no data

2560x1440
Ultra Settings

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
63
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
124
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
102
 
no data

4K
High Settings

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
49
 
no data
Metro Exodus
 
37
 
no data
Red Dead Redemption 2
 
28
 
no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
47
 
no data

4K
Ultra Settings

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
40
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
73
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
56
 
no data

Competitors of Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 29% and lower by 51 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile:

Competitors of Quadro P2000 Mobile from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P2000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 24% and lower by 33 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P2000 Mobile:

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

7.6% higher performance in benchmarks

Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 5 July 2017)

Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)

More pipelines (3072 vs 768)

Higher memory bandwidth (448 vs 96.13 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)

DLSS

Raytracing

VR Ready

G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

Cheaper ($1477 vs $3065)

Lower power consumption (50W vs 110W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.