Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	134	433
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	3.56
Power efficiency	23.94	10.14
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	TU104	GM206
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	768
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	796 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1163 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	55.82
Floating-point processing power	9.492 TFLOPS	1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	192	48
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	201 mm
Width	no data	1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	Up to 106 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
VR Ready	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +277%	35−40 −277%
1440p	84 +250%	24−27 −250%
4K	57 +256%	16−18 −256%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+272%

18−20

−272%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +247%	30−33 −247%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +267%	18−20 −267%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +254%	35−40 −254%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	125 +257%	35−40 −257%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +272%	18−20 −272%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +295%	21−24 −295%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +252%	27−30 −252%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +278%	50−55 −278%
Hitman 3	80−85 +290%	21−24 −290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +258%	45−50 −258%
Metro Exodus	144 +260%	40−45 −260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 +277%	30−33 −277%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +250%	40−45 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +266%	35−40 −266%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +290%	21−24 −290%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +267%	18−20 −267%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +254%	35−40 −254%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +293%	30−33 −293%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +272%	18−20 −272%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +295%	21−24 −295%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +252%	27−30 −252%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +278%	50−55 −278%
Hitman 3	80−85 +290%	21−24 −290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +258%	45−50 −258%
Metro Exodus	144 +260%	40−45 −260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +267%	27−30 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +250%	40−45 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +281%	21−24 −281%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +266%	35−40 −266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 +248%	21−24 −248%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +267%	18−20 −267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +267%	24−27 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +272%	18−20 −272%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +295%	21−24 −295%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +278%	50−55 −278%
Hitman 3	80−85 +290%	21−24 −290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +258%	45−50 −258%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +250%	40−45 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +270%	27−30 −270%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +266%	35−40 −266%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

+260%

30−33
−260%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +252%	21−24 −252%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +250%	18−20 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +267%	18−20 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +267%	12−14 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +262%	60−65 −262%
Hitman 3	50−55 +257%	14−16 −257%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +295%	21−24 −295%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +300%	18−20 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +288%	24−27 −288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +280%	50−55 −280%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90
+275%

24−27

−275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +280%	10−11 −280%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Hitman 3	30−35 +288%	8−9 −288%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +258%	50−55 −258%
Metro Exodus	76 +262%	21−24 −262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +294%	18−20 −294%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +300%	10−11 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +280%	10−11 −280%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+257%

14−16

−257%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 277% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 250% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 256% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.88	10.36
Recency	27 May 2019	8 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 246.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.