GeForce 8800 Ultra vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with GeForce 8800 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
32.53
+2040%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms 8800 Ultra by a whopping 2040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking169987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiency22.550.68
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU104G80
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)2 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$829

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072612
Core clock speed1035 MHz612 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate296.639.17
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.3871 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data270 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1080 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s103.7 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
1440p84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
4K54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data138.17
1440pno data276.33
4Kno data414.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+2263%
8−9
−2263%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90
+2050%
4−5
−2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 165
+2257%
7−8
−2257%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+2263%
8−9
−2263%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Far Cry 5 128
+2460%
5−6
−2460%
Fortnite 140−150
+2383%
6−7
−2383%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%
Valorant 200−210
+2167%
9−10
−2167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 162
+2214%
7−8
−2214%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+2263%
8−9
−2263%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2225%
12−14
−2225%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Dota 2 98
+2350%
4−5
−2350%
Far Cry 5 123
+2360%
5−6
−2360%
Fortnite 140−150
+2383%
6−7
−2383%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+2200%
5−6
−2200%
Metro Exodus 99
+2375%
4−5
−2375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+2163%
8−9
−2163%
Valorant 200−210
+2167%
9−10
−2167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+2071%
7−8
−2071%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Dota 2 92
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Far Cry 5 115
+2200%
5−6
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2117%
6−7
−2117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Valorant 181
+2163%
8−9
−2163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+2383%
6−7
−2383%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+2600%
3−4
−2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+2220%
10−11
−2220%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Metro Exodus 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2088%
8−9
−2088%
Valorant 230−240
+2290%
10−11
−2290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+2380%
5−6
−2380%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry 5 102
+2450%
4−5
−2450%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
Metro Exodus 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Valorant 200−210
+2144%
9−10
−2144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 100−105
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Far Cry 5 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and 8800 Ultra compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 2100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 2700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.53 1.52
Recency 27 May 2019 2 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 171 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 2040.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 55.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 43 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 33 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or GeForce 8800 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.