Quadro M2200 vs RTX 4000

Place in performance ranking	96	394
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	28.71	1.00
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	TU104	N17P-Q3
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 November 2018 (5 years ago)	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data
Current price	$974 (1.1x MSRP)	$1967

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4000 has 2771% better value for money than Quadro M2200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1005 MHz	694 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1038 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.5	66.30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 and Quadro M2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	13000 MHz	5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth	416.0 GB/s	88 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.86
+262%

Quadro M2200 11.01

RTX 4000 outperforms M2200 by 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 15393
+262%

Quadro M2200 4253

RTX 4000 outperforms M2200 by 262% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RTX 4000 85719
+571%

Quadro M2200 12777

RTX 4000 outperforms M2200 by 571% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RTX 4000 80386
+411%

Quadro M2200 15742

RTX 4000 outperforms M2200 by 411% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RTX 4000 94250
+636%

Quadro M2200 12812

RTX 4000 outperforms M2200 by 636% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 +249%	43 −249%
4K	45−50 +246%	13 −246%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.86	11.01
Recency	13 November 2018	13 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	55 Watt