Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
27.84

Pro B50 outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency22.4334.32
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGP104BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1316 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate251.0332.8
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs160128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P5200 Max-Q 27.84
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+7.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12308
Samples: 30
Arc Pro B50 13186
+7.1%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.84 29.82
Recency 21 February 2018 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Arc Pro B50.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 16 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 Max-Q or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.