GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 750 Ti, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
31.10
+236%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GTX 750 Ti by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168459
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.58
Power efficiency21.0011.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU104GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)18 February 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed1110 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate249.643.40
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS1.389 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16040
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s86.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.5+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 Mobile 31.10
+236%
GTX 750 Ti 9.25

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+372%
GTX 750 Ti 5378

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+160%
GTX 750 Ti 21608

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+339%
GTX 750 Ti 4294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+280%
GTX 750 Ti 31349

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+114%
50
−114%
1440p63
+250%
18−20
−250%
4K47
+292%
12−14
−292%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.98
1440pno data8.28
4Kno data12.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+266%
50−55
−266%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+279%
18−20
−279%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 101
+140%
40−45
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+266%
50−55
−266%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+279%
18−20
−279%
Far Cry 5 106
+242%
30−35
−242%
Fortnite 140−150
+153%
55−60
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+202%
40−45
−202%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+245%
27−30
−245%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+274%
30−35
−274%
Valorant 190−200
+116%
90−95
−116%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+107%
40−45
−107%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+266%
50−55
−266%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+91.7%
140−150
−91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+279%
18−20
−279%
Dota 2 132
+94.1%
65−70
−94.1%
Far Cry 5 100
+223%
30−35
−223%
Fortnite 140−150
+153%
55−60
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+202%
40−45
−202%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+245%
27−30
−245%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+206%
35−40
−206%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+284%
18−20
−284%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+274%
30−35
−274%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+496%
24−27
−496%
Valorant 190−200
+116%
90−95
−116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+92.9%
40−45
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+279%
18−20
−279%
Dota 2 127
+86.8%
65−70
−86.8%
Far Cry 5 96
+210%
30−35
−210%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+202%
40−45
−202%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+274%
30−35
−274%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+213%
24−27
−213%
Valorant 190−200
+116%
90−95
−116%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+153%
55−60
−153%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+353%
16−18
−353%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+206%
70−75
−206%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+257%
45−50
−257%
Valorant 230−240
+121%
100−110
−121%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+187%
21−24
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Far Cry 5 69
+245%
20−22
−245%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+274%
21−24
−274%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+338%
12−14
−338%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+300%
20−22
−300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+220%
20−22
−220%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+410%
10−11
−410%
Valorant 190−200
+292%
45−50
−292%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+282%
10−12
−282%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Dota 2 106
+203%
35−40
−203%
Far Cry 5 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+256%
16−18
−256%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 114% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 250% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 292% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 1067% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed GTX 750 Ti in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.10 9.25
Recency 27 May 2019 18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 236.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750 Ti, on the other hand, has 83.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 35 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 6978 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or GeForce GTX 750 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.