Radeon Pro W5500 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	191	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	6.18	46.10
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N19E-Q1	Navi 14
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years old)	10 February 2020 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$2393	$308 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5500 has 646% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1408
Core clock speed	945 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	198.7	123.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro W5500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.12
+10.6%

Pro W5500 23.61

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W5500 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+10.6%

Pro W5500 9146

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W5500 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95 +11.8%	85−90 −11.8%
4K	88 +17.3%	75−80 −17.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+22.9%

35−40

−22.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	77 +18.5%	65−70 −18.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +12%	75−80 −12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +15%	60−65 −15%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	91 +13.8%	80−85 −13.8%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
Hitman 3	75−80 +12.9%	70−75 −12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100 +11.1%	90−95 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +12.7%	55−60 −12.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +12%	75−80 −12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +15%	60−65 −15%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	86 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
Hitman 3	75−80 +12.9%	70−75 −12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	84 +12%	75−80 −12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 +14.7%	95−100 −14.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	39 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +12%	75−80 −12%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +18.5%	65−70 −18.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +14.7%	75−80 −14.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +12%	50−55 −12%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +16%	50−55 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +20%	45−50 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Hitman 3	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +20.8%	24−27 −20.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Pro W5500 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RTX 3000 Mobile is 11.8% faster than Pro W5500

4K resolution:

RTX 3000 Mobile is 17.3% faster than Pro W5500

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	26.12	23.61
Recency	27 May 2019	10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	125 Watt