Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Quadro P620

Place in performance ranking	435	14
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	20.76	19.59
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years old)	10 May 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,099
Current price	$170	$961 (0.9x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 6% better value for money than RX 6950 XT.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	5120
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	2324 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	335 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.33	743.7
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.36

RX 6950 XT 73.14
+681%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 681% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P620 3624

RX 6950 XT 28331
+682%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 682% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P620 25105

RX 6950 XT 119918
+378%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 378% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P620 5909

RX 6950 XT 72228
+1122%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 1122% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P620 4673

RX 6950 XT 59882
+1182%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 1182% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P620 30410

RX 6950 XT 229172
+654%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 654% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P620 310112

RX 6950 XT 497297
+60.4%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 60% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 41

RX 6950 XT 143
+249%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 249% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 79

RX 6950 XT 188
+138%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 138% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 50

RX 6950 XT 53
+5.2%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 5% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 54

RX 6950 XT 284
+423%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 423% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 59

RX 6950 XT 139
+134%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 134% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 15

RX 6950 XT 77
+430%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 430% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 26

RX 6950 XT 286
+1009%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 1009% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P620 4

RX 6950 XT 29
+636%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro P620 by 636% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48 −358%	220 +358%
1440p	16−18 −769%	139 +769%
4K	10−12 −780%	88 +780%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−973%

161
+973%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −455%	110−120 +455%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −406%	160−170 +406%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −604%	170−180 +604%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −853%	143 +853%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −687%	181 +687%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −508%	152 +508%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −521%	200−210 +521%
Hitman 3	24−27 −783%	210−220 +783%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −747%	160−170 +747%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −669%	120−130 +669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −1625%	276 +1625%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −713%	130 +713%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −455%	110−120 +455%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −406%	160−170 +406%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −604%	170−180 +604%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −753%	128 +753%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −652%	173 +652%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −488%	147 +488%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −521%	200−210 +521%
Hitman 3	24−27 −783%	210−220 +783%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −747%	160−170 +747%
Metro Exodus	17 −1012%	189 +1012%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −669%	120−130 +669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −1877%	257 +1877%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 −1075%	376 +1075%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −619%	115 +619%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −455%	110−120 +455%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −406%	160−170 +406%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −713%	122 +713%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −613%	164 +613%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −428%	132 +428%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −521%	200−210 +521%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −1171%	216 +1171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −569%	107 +569%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −857%	130−140 +857%
Hitman 3	14−16 −1000%	160−170 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −733%	120−130 +733%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1400%	120 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1100%	70−75 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1458%	187 +1458%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −811%	80−85 +811%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1760%	90−95 +1760%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −820%	130−140 +820%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2225%	93 +2225%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −987%	163 +987%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −780%	132 +780%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −924%	170−180 +924%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1433%	130−140 +1433%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −2475%	103 +2475%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1283%	80−85 +1283%
Hitman 3	9−10 −967%	95−100 +967%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −950%	80−85 +950%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2467%	77 +2467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −860%	45−50 +860%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −1880%	99 +1880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1957%	144 +1957%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1080%	55−60 +1080%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1375%	55−60 +1375%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −1286%	95−100 +1286%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4500%	46 +4500%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1450%	124 +1450%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −1080%	118 +1080%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1073%	120−130 +1073%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%

This is how Quadro P620 and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RX 6950 XT is 358% faster than Quadro P620

1440p resolution:

RX 6950 XT is 769% faster than Quadro P620

4K resolution:

RX 6950 XT is 780% faster than Quadro P620

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 4500% faster than the Quadro P620.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6950 XT surpassed Quadro P620 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	9.36	73.14
Recency	27 May 2019	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	335 Watt