Radeon Pro 5700 vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro 5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.20

Pro 5700 outperforms P620 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking483198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.2316.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed1177 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18194.4
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 8.20
Pro 5700 26.51
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3664
Pro 5700 11844
+223%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−219%
150−160
+219%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−210%
90−95
+210%
Fortnite 113
−210%
350−400
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Valorant 85−90
−222%
280−290
+222%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−192%
400−450
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Dota 2 90
−222%
290−300
+222%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−210%
90−95
+210%
Fortnite 42
−210%
130−140
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Metro Exodus 17
−194%
50−55
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−213%
100−105
+213%
Valorant 85−90
−222%
280−290
+222%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Dota 2 83
−213%
260−270
+213%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−210%
90−95
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−194%
50−55
+194%
Valorant 85−90
−222%
280−290
+222%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
−210%
90−95
+210%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−209%
210−220
+209%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Valorant 100−105
−200%
300−310
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Valorant 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

This is how Quadro P620 and Pro 5700 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5700 is 219% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.20 26.51
Recency 1 February 2018 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 130 Watt

Quadro P620 has 225% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has a 223.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 668 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Radeon Pro 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.