Radeon 740M vs Quadro P620

Place in performance ranking	439	451
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	20.70	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GP107	Phoenix
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$170	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	256
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	43.33	40.00
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P620 and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.38
+4.2%

Radeon 740M 9.00

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon 740M by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P620 3627
+4.3%

Radeon 740M 3478

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon 740M by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

52
+15.6%

45−50

−15.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+7.1%

14−16

−7.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	35 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	64 +137%	27−30 −137%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 −333%	24−27 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+4%

24−27

−4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

This is how Quadro P620 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 16% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 137% faster than the Radeon 740M.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 740M is 333% faster than the Quadro P620.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 50 tests (69%)
Radeon 740M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.38	9.00
Recency	27 May 2019	23 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	30 Watt