Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with Matrox M9125 PCIe x16, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.44
+15633%

P620 outperforms Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 by a whopping 15633% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4681467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)PX
GPU code nameGP107PX-A1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1177 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate46.182.000
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 2x LFH60

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.44
+15633%
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 0.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3641
+14464%
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Hitman 3 18−20 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 35 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Hitman 3 18−20 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 28 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Hitman 3 18−20 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Hitman 3 12−14 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 0.06
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Quadro P620 has a 15633.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
M9125 PCIe x16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 612 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.