Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9 M GL / 870 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
36.95
+190%

P6000 outperforms RX Vega M GL / 870 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RX Vega M GL / 870 RX Vega M GL / 870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.68no data
Power efficiency11.2814.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401280
Core clock speed1506 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitHBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1127 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+179%
43
−179%
1440p80−85
+186%
28
−186%
4K40−45
+186%
14
−186%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99no data
1440p74.99no data
4K149.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+0%
38
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
God of War 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
God of War 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX Vega M GL / 870 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 179% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 186% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 186% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 36.95 12.72
Recency 1 October 2016 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 190.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega M GL / 870, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
Quadro P400 P400
M3000 SE M3000 SE
vs
Quadro P600 P600
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Quadro P600 P600
GT 720M GT 720M
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 RTX 3070 Ti GA102
vs
M3000 SE M3000 SE
Arc 140T Mobile Arc 140T Mobile
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
W5130M W5130M
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
R5 M430 R5 M430
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
vs
Quadro M6000 M6000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 118 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 120 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.