Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9 M GL / 870 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
8.58

M GL / 870 outperforms P102-100 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
RX Vega M GL / 870 RX Vega M GL / 870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency2.6415.01
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (8 years ago)7 January 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32001280
Core clock speed1582 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6no data
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs200no data
L1 Cache1.2 MBno data
L2 Cache2.5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1376 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−59.3%
43
+59.3%
1440p18−20
−55.6%
28
+55.6%
4K9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.19no data
1440p33.28no data
4K66.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 38
+0%
38
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RX Vega M GL / 870 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 56% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 56% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.58 12.67
Recency 12 February 2018 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

P102-100 has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega M GL / 870, on the other hand, has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 285% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
P102-100 P102 100
vs
T400 T400
2270 PCIe x1 AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
vs
RX Vega 2 RX Vega 2
Pro Vega 56 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
FirePro S9050 FirePro S9050
Pro Vega 56 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
8600 GTS GeForce 8600 GTS
Radeon 530X AMD Radeon 530X
vs
R1E Mobile Graphics R1E Mobile Graphics
NX-SoC NVIDIA NX SoC
vs
HD 8210E HD 8210E
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
RX 5300 RX 5300
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
P30PH P30PH
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI M7820 FirePro M7820
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI Mobility X1400 Radeon X1400
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI Rage 128 Ultra Rage 128 Ultra

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 41 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.