Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
37.27
RX 6800 XT
2020, $649
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
60.69
+62.8%

6800 XT outperforms P6000 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7241.08
Power efficiency11.4615.36
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 2288% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404608
Core clock speed1506 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8648.0
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs240288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cache1.4 MB1 MB
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 37.27
RX 6800 XT 60.69
+62.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15390
Samples: 188
RX 6800 XT 25060
+62.8%
Samples: 7600

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−77.3%
195
+77.3%
1440p80−85
−72.5%
138
+72.5%
4K55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p54.54
−1539%
3.33
+1539%
1440p74.99
−1494%
4.70
+1494%
4K109.07
−1446%
7.05
+1446%
  • RX 6800 XT has 1539% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1494% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1446% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Far Cry 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175
+0%
175
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+0%
160
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 77% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 73% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.27 60.69
Recency 1 October 2016 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro V620 Radeon Pro V620
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro P2000 P2000
vs
9800 GT 9800 GT
Quadro P2000 P2000
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
Quadro P2000 P2000
vs
RTX A4000H RTX A4000H
Quadro P2000 P2000
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Arc Graphics 64EU
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
FirePro W9100 W9100
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
RX 6850 XT RX 6850 XT
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT
Quadro P6000 P6000
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 120 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4661 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.