Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro P6000

Place in the ranking	107	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.11	49.92
Power efficiency	11.01	14.92
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 XT has 1115% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	4608
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	648.0
Floating-point processing power	12.63 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	128
TMUs	240	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.99

RX 6800 XT 65.04
+62.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15373

RX 6800 XT 25003
+62.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120−130 −69.2%	203 +69.2%
1440p	85−90 −70.6%	145 +70.6%
4K	60−65 −66.7%	100 +66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	49.99 −1464%	3.20 +1464%
1440p	70.58 −1477%	4.48 +1477%
4K	99.98 −1441%	6.49 +1441%

RX 6800 XT has 1464% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6800 XT has 1477% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6800 XT has 1441% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Elden Ring	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	404 +0%	404 +0%
Metro Exodus	127 +0%	127 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Valorant	401 +0%	401 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Elden Ring	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Fortnite	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	355 +0%	355 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	150 +0%	150 +0%
Metro Exodus	120 +0%	120 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	129 +0%	129 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	173 +0%	173 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Dota 2	145 +0%	145 +0%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	302 +0%	302 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	356 +0%	356 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	120 +0%	120 +0%
Elden Ring	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 +0%	120 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
World of Tanks	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +0%	222 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	278 +0%	278 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	134 +0%	134 +0%
Elden Ring	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +0%	134 +0%
Metro Exodus	56 +0%	56 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +0%	53 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	134 +0%	134 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	133 +0%	133 +0%
Valorant	153 +0%	153 +0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 69% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 71% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.99	65.04
Recency	1 October 2016	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.