Radeon RX 6800 XT vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.89

6800 XT outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9243.57
Power efficiency2.4215.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 4636% better value for money than P102-100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32004608
Core clock speed1582 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6648.0
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs80128
TMUs200288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cache1.2 MB1 MB
L2 Cache2.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB16 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.89
RX 6800 XT 59.73
+657%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3300
Samples: 4
RX 6800 XT 24982
+657%
Samples: 6760

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−713%
195
+713%
1440p18−20
−667%
138
+667%
4K12−14
−667%
92
+667%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.96
−650%
3.33
+650%
1440p33.28
−608%
4.70
+608%
4K49.92
−608%
7.05
+608%
  • RX 6800 XT has 650% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 608% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 608% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175
+0%
175
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+0%
160
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 713% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 667% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 667% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.89 59.73
Recency 12 February 2018 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

P102-100 has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 657% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
R7 M365X AMD R7 M365X
vs
RX 6400 6400
R7 M365X AMD R7 M365X
vs
PRO W7700 W7700
R7 A360 AMD R7 A360
vs
Radeon 740M 740M
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GMA X3100 X3100
P102-100 P102 100
vs
FX 470 470
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 3080 Ti 20 GB
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RX 7700S 7700S
P102-100 P102 100
vs
PRO V710 V710
R7 350 AMD R7 350
vs
R7 M360 M360
R7 350 AMD R7 350
vs
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4353 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.