HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) HD Graphics 405 HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
34.52
+8984%

P6000 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 8984% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1121255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.14no data
Power efficiency10.99no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP102Braswell
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384012
Core clock speed1506 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate394.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 Bitno data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD700−750
+8650%
8
−8650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 8650% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.52 0.38
Recency 1 October 2016 1 April 2016
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

Quadro P6000 has a 8984.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
vs
GT 325M GeForce GT 325M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
M3000 SE NVIDIA M3000 SE
vs
Tegra K1 K1
M3000 SE NVIDIA M3000 SE
vs
GeForce MX330 MX330
M3000 SE NVIDIA M3000 SE
vs
RTX A4000 A4000
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile 1060 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
W7170M W7170M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RX 470 470
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Radeon E6760 E6760
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro Duo Polaris Duo Polaris
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Riva 128 128

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 96 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 244 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.