Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro M5500 vs P5200
Aggregated performance score
Quadro P5200
2017
16 GB GDDR5
31.80
+55.6%
Quadro M5500
2016
8GB GDDR5
20.44
P5200 outperforms M5500 by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 164 | 251 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 3.42 | 2.71 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Maxwell (2014−2018) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GM204 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 January 2017 (7 years old) | 4 April 2016 (8 years old) |
| Current price | $3894 | $1700 |
Value for money
Quadro P5200 has 26% better value for money than Quadro M5500.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 5200 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 | 149.1 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P5200 and Quadro M5500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| SLI options | no data | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | 6606 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | no data | 1.2 |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Pro | no data | + |
| Mosaic | no data | + |
| VR Ready | no data | + |
| nView Display Management | no data | + |
| Optimus | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
P5200 outperforms M5500 by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
P5200 outperforms M5500 by 56% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 119
+58.7%
| 75−80
−58.7%
|
| 4K | 48
+60%
| 30−35
−60%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+63.6%
|
30−35
−63.6%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
+40.5%
|
40−45
−40.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
+55.6%
|
35−40
−55.6%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+44.1%
|
65−70
−44.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90
+60.4%
|
50−55
−60.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+63.6%
|
30−35
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+51.9%
|
50−55
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85
+45.5%
|
55−60
−45.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 95−100
+67.8%
|
55−60
−67.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70
+54.5%
|
40−45
−54.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+54.5%
|
30−35
−54.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 91
+107%
|
40−45
−107%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+53.8%
|
35−40
−53.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
+40.5%
|
40−45
−40.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
+55.6%
|
35−40
−55.6%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+44.1%
|
65−70
−44.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90
+60.4%
|
50−55
−60.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+63.6%
|
30−35
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+51.9%
|
50−55
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85
+45.5%
|
55−60
−45.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 95−100
+67.8%
|
55−60
−67.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70
+54.5%
|
40−45
−54.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+66.7%
|
30−35
−66.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+54.5%
|
30−35
−54.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 78
+77.3%
|
40−45
−77.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 118
+162%
|
45−50
−162%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+53.8%
|
35−40
−53.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
+40.5%
|
40−45
−40.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
+55.6%
|
35−40
−55.6%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+44.1%
|
65−70
−44.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+63.6%
|
30−35
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+51.9%
|
50−55
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85
+45.5%
|
55−60
−45.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65
+44.4%
|
45−50
−44.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+53.8%
|
35−40
−53.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+64.5%
|
30−35
−64.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+69.7%
|
30−35
−69.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+65%
|
20−22
−65%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+66.7%
|
14−16
−66.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50
+73.1%
|
24−27
−73.1%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+59.1%
|
21−24
−59.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+78.9%
|
18−20
−78.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+53.3%
|
45−50
−53.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+91.7%
|
12−14
−91.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+64.7%
|
30−35
−64.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 60−65
+56.4%
|
35−40
−56.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+61%
|
40−45
−61%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+82.6%
|
21−24
−82.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+63.2%
|
18−20
−63.2%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+69.2%
|
12−14
−69.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+75%
|
12−14
−75%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 26
+85.7%
|
14−16
−85.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+119%
|
21−24
−119%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+61.5%
|
12−14
−61.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
+72.7%
|
10−12
−72.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+64.7%
|
16−18
−64.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
+60%
|
20−22
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+51.7%
|
27−30
−51.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
This is how Quadro P5200 and Quadro M5500 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- Quadro P5200 is 58.7% faster than Quadro M5500
4K resolution:
- Quadro P5200 is 60% faster than Quadro M5500
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 162% faster than the Quadro M5500.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Quadro P5200 surpassed Quadro M5500 in all 68 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 31.80 | 20.44 |
| Recency | 11 January 2017 | 4 April 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
