Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 5500 XT, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.68
+37.8%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms RX 5500 XT by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking167237
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.71
Power efficiency22.5512.59
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)12 December 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speed1316 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1845 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate251.0162.4
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS5.196 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.68
+37.8%
RX 5500 XT 23.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12568
+37.8%
RX 5500 XT 9122

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+29.9%
77
−29.9%
1440p55−60
+31%
42
−31%
4K30−35
+20%
25
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.19
1440pno data4.02
4Kno data6.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Elden Ring 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Valorant 139
+0%
139
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Elden Ring 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+0%
108
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Elden Ring 51
+0%
51
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
World of Tanks 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+0%
66
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 91
+0%
91
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Elden Ring 20
+0%
20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+0%
42
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+0%
8
+0%
Dota 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RX 5500 XT compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 30% faster in 1080p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 31% faster in 1440p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.68 23.72
Recency 21 February 2018 12 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 130 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 37.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 30% lower power consumption.

RX 5500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2986 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.