Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Max-Q Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q
VS
Radeon RX 5500 Radeon RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5800 Radeon RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 5900 Radeon RX 5900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 5500 XT, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.47
+37.1%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms RX 5500 XT by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165231
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.99
Power efficiency22.5512.65
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)12 December 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speed1316 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1845 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate251.0162.4
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS5.196 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.47
+37.1%
RX 5500 XT 23.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12530
+37.1%
RX 5500 XT 9137

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+28.2%
78
−28.2%
1440p55−60
+31%
42
−31%
4K30−35
+25%
24
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+0%
72
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 64
+0%
64
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 132
+0%
132
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+0%
202
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 66
+0%
66
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+0%
58
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 62
+0%
62
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+0%
108
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+0%
202
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+0%
56
+0%
Hitman 3 55
+0%
55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
+0%
95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hitman 3 36
+0%
36
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 184
+0%
184
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+0%
49
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 26
+0%
26
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+0%
19
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+0%
8
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+0%
21
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+0%
38
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+0%
14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+0%
24
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RX 5500 XT compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 28% faster in 1080p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 31% faster in 1440p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.47 23.68
Recency 21 February 2018 12 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 130 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 30% lower power consumption.

RX 5500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Pro WX 7130 Mobile Radeon Pro WX 7130 Mobile
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 7
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 12 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2822 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.