Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	160	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	15.35
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Navi 14 XTX
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	12 December 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$169
Current price	no data	$317 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1408
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	1607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1845 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	251.0	162.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon RX 5500 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	180 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.9 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 31.99
+34.9%

RX 5500 XT 23.71

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 5500 XT by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P5200 Max-Q 12355
+35%

RX 5500 XT 9155

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 5500 XT by 35% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95−100 +28.4%	74 −28.4%
1440p	55−60 +34.1%	41 −34.1%
4K	30−35 +25%	24 −25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+41.8%

55−60

−41.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +44%	50−55 −44%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +35.6%	45−50 −35.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	64 +42.2%	45−50 −42.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	166 +38.3%	120−130 −38.3%
Metro Exodus	132 +38.9%	95−100 −38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	108 +35%	80−85 −35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +40%	95−100 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 +48%	50−55 −48%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +38.7%	75−80 −38.7%
Hitman 3	61 +35.6%	45−50 −35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +44.6%	65−70 −44.6%
Metro Exodus	93 +43.1%	65−70 −43.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	88 +35.4%	65−70 −35.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	108 +35%	80−85 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +35.7%	70−75 −35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	202 +44.3%	140−150 −44.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	56 +40%	40−45 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +45%	60−65 −45%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 +35.7%	70−75 −35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Watch Dogs: Legion	36 +50%	24−27 −50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

76
+38.2%

55−60

−38.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	67 +48.9%	45−50 −48.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	60 +50%	40−45 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Hitman 3	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Metro Exodus	60 +50%	40−45 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

49
+40%

35−40

−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Hitman 3	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21 +50%	14−16 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Metro Exodus	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +40%	10−11 −40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24
+50%

16−18

−50%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RX 5500 XT compete in popular games:

P5200 Max-Q is 28% faster in 1080p
P5200 Max-Q is 34% faster in 1440p
P5200 Max-Q is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.99	23.71
Recency	21 February 2018	12 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt