Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P5200
VS
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with Radeon PRO WX 3100, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.61
+390%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking166564
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.19
Power efficiency22.507.06
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Lexa
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)12 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560512
Core clock speed1316 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate251.039.01
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.61
+390%
PRO WX 3100 6.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12568
+390%
PRO WX 3100 2565

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+362%
13
−362%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+0%
7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and PRO WX 3100 compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 362% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 71 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.61 6.65
Recency 21 February 2018 12 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 390.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 3100, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
RTX A500 Embedded RTX A500 Embedded
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB H100 PCIe 80 GB
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GTX 1660 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 7350 PCI Radeon HD 7350 PCI
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
FX 4400 Quadro FX 4400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 54 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.