RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P5200
VS
L40S RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.61

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.06
Power efficiency22.5017.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256018176
Core clock speed1316 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate251.01,423
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs160568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.61
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.78
+129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12568
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28825
+129%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−141%
181
+141%
1440p70−75
−143%
170
+143%
4K50−55
−136%
118
+136%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.56
1440pno data39.99
4Kno data57.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
+0%
260
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 141% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 143% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 136% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.61 74.78
Recency 21 February 2018 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 129.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB H100 PCIe 80 GB
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GTX 1660 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 7350 PCI Radeon HD 7350 PCI
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
FX 4400 Quadro FX 4400
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro 575 Radeon Pro 575

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.