RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
L20 L40 L40 CNX L40G L40S RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.62

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.70
Power efficiency22.4216.95
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256018176
Core clock speed1316 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate251.01,423
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs160568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P5200 Max-Q 32.62
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.95
+127%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12568
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28492
+127%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−130%
184
+130%
1440p70−75
−131%
162
+131%
4K45−50
−147%
111
+147%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.95
1440pno data41.97
4Kno data61.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 489
+0%
489
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
+0%
260
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 130% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 131% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 147% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.62 73.95
Recency 21 February 2018 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 126.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
GTX 1650 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GTX 1660 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1660 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1070 GDDR5X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
P5200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
P5200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 7350 PCI HD 7350 PCI
RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
vs
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
vs
FX 4400 FX 4400
RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro 575 Pro 575

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 Max-Q or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.