ATI FirePro M5800 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3900 M5950 M8900 M5800 M7820

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q and FirePro M5800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.69
+2220%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms M5800 by a whopping 2220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2151072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.823.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP104Madison
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560400
Core clock speed1316 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate251.013.00
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16020
L1 Cache960 KB40 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD450−500
+2043%
21
−2043%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 2043% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.69 1.28
Recency 21 February 2018 1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 26 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 2219.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI M5800, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
vs
Quadro 1000M Quadro 1000M
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
HD 8470D Radeon HD 8470D
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
HD 6990M Crossfire Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
R9 M385 Radeon R9 M385
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
GT 430 GeForce GT 430
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4570 Mobility Radeon HD 4570
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
9200M GS GeForce 9200M GS
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
ATI HD 3200 Radeon HD 3200
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 16 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 Max-Q or FirePro M5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.