ATI FirePro M5800 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3900 M5950 M8900 M5800 M7820

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q and FirePro M5800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
27.55
+2052%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms M5800 by a whopping 2052% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P4200 Max-Q P4200 Max-Q
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2341074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.193.79
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP104Madison
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304400
Core clock speed1215 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate213.113.00
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14420
L1 Cache864 KB40 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD450−500
+2043%
21
−2043%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how P4200 Max-Q and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

  • P4200 Max-Q is 2043% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 48 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 27.55 1.28
Recency 21 February 2018 1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 26 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 2052.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI M5800, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
vs
Quadro 1000M Quadro 1000M
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
R9 270X R9 270X
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
HD 8470D HD 8470D
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 470M GTX 470M
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
HD 8830M HD 8830M
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
GT 430 GT 430
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4570 Radeon HD 4570
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
ATI Mobility HD 540v Radeon HD 540v
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
G 103M G 103M
P4200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
ATI Xpress 1250 Xpress 1250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 Max-Q or FirePro M5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.