A100 SXM4 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.49no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25606912
Core clock speed1316 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate251.0609.1
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs64160
TMUs160432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount16 GB40 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s1,555 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.18.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 400 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has 300% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5200 Max-Q and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 13 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.