UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Quadro P520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P520 with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P520
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 18 Watt
4.91
+135%

P520 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7815.92
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGP108Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 May 2019 (6 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38424
Core clock speed1303 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate35.83no data
Floating-point processing power1.147 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P520 4.91
+135%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P520 4186
+187%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P520 3218
+191%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P520 19041
+127%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 8388

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P520 1011
+224%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 312

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
4K20
+150%
8−9
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 20
+300%
5−6
−300%
Fortnite 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+100%
40−45
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 60
+253%
17
−253%
Far Cry 5 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Fortnite 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Metro Exodus 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+138%
8
−138%
Valorant 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 54
+238%
16
−238%
Far Cry 5 16
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+175%
4
−175%
Valorant 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Valorant 55−60
+244%
16−18
−244%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Sons of the Forest 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Quadro P520 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P520 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P520 is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P520 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P520 surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.91 2.09
Recency 23 May 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 4 Watt

Quadro P520 has a 134.9% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P520 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P520 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.