Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Radeon RX 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.42no data
Power efficiency14.37no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 10Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640
Core clock speed1465 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate248.444.00
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS1.408 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs14440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length268 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2019 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

RX 5700 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5700 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1731 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 150 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.